Should we trust anonymous political speech?

Reason TV issues a warning about the activities of "Publius."



 
Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • October 19, 2010 woundedduck wrote:
    There's a difference between the Federalist papers and anonymously tweeting "Thomas Jefferson cheated on his wife." The former is a well-designed and considered social document, the other a baseless, pernicious slur. I think the founding fathers would have understood the difference.

    EDITOR COMMENT:  No doubt they would have understood the difference, because they engaged in it.  Anonymous political speech was part and parcel of the nation's fabric from the 1700's.  The presidential election of 1800 was in large part driven by anonymous political speech, for example.  Jefferson's anonymous charges tainted Adams, and vice versa.  These Constitutional giants practiced anonymous political speech as well as any since.  I'm sure some academic's blogs would be appalled by their actions if they existed in 1800.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.