"Is the Voting Rights Act living on borrowed time"?
According to a blog on AJC, quoting Columbia University law professor Nathaniel Persily. Actually, the headline is a bit misleading as the Supreme Court is skeptical of the most instrusive part of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) which they have now repeatedly expressed constitutional concerns, not directed at the VRA as a whole. The states are looking to mend, not end the Voting Right Act.
Comments